Microsoft Ads Policies, Approval & Disapproval 2026

Microsoft Advertising Policies: Three Tiers, One Mental Model

Microsoft Advertising — formerly Bing Ads, rebranded in April 2019 — organizes its content rules into three tiers that work differently and require different responses from advertisers: prohibited (disallowed) content that is off-limits with no exception path, restricted content that is allowed only with conditions or certifications, and editorial guidelines that govern copy style, grammar, and landing-page quality for all ads. Understanding which tier a disapproval falls into determines the fix. The bing ads policies framework carried over from the pre-rebrand era intact — the tier structure, the reason codes, and the appeal path are the same system under a new name.

This page is written for the advertiser whose ad has just gone Disapproved, Approved Limited, or is sitting as Inactive under review — and who needs to know whether they did something wrong, how long the wait is, and how to get unstuck. It is also the reference page for policy-sensitive verticals — legal PPC, financial services PPC, insurance PPC, CBD & hemp PPC, and supplements & nutrition PPC — deciding before they spend whether Microsoft Advertising will accept their category and what certification or exception is required.

The search term "bing ads policies" still drives traffic to this topic years after the April 2019 rebrand. Whether you know the platform as Bing Ads or as Microsoft Advertising, the policy framework described here is the same. The rules apply on the Microsoft Search Network (Bing, Yahoo, AOL, DuckDuckGo, Ecosia, and their syndication partners) and the Microsoft Audience Network as distinct surfaces — a disapproval on Search does not automatically carry over to Audience placements. Ad statuses and account structure context are covered below.

Three misconceptions dominate this topic and each costs time or money: that "restricted" means banned (restricted means allowed with a condition); that a disapproval pauses the entire campaign (since November 2025, the November 2025 asset-level review means a disapproval typically pauses one asset while the rest of the ad keeps serving); and that "Approved Limited" signals low quality (it signals a location-eligibility gap, not a quality penalty). Each has a concrete, documented counter in Microsoft's own policy documentation — addressed in full below.

Key Takeaways

• Microsoft Advertising has three policy tiers: prohibited content (off-limits, no exception path), restricted content (allowed with conditions — certification or exception request), and editorial guidelines (style, grammar, and landing-page standards that generate the majority of disapprovals in practice).
• Most disapprovals are editorial hygiene — capitalization, punctuation, unsupported superlatives, vague CTAs, and landing-page gaps. All are fixable without involving Microsoft's compliance team: read the reason code, fix the specific asset or page, resubmit.
• Since November 2025, Microsoft reviews each ad asset independently. A disapproved headline pauses only that headline; the ad keeps serving on its remaining approved assets. The new statuses — "Some assets disapproved," "Most assets disapproved," "Essential assets disapproved" — describe how much of the ad is compromised, not a binary pass/fail.
• "Approved Limited" is a location signal, not a quality penalty. It means the ad serves where it passed review while still pending or held in at least one other targeted location. The fix is identifying which location is holding back approval, not rewriting the creative.
• The ad-level appeal system runs via AppealEditorialRejections with a hard limit of 2,000 appeals per 24-hour rolling window and 10,000 maximum pending appeals per account at any time.
• Account-level enforcement operates on a separate track from ad disapprovals. Egregious violations — malware, phishing, circumventing ad-system safeguards — trigger immediate permanent suspension. Policy compliance is account-protection, not just ad-approval mechanics.

Why “It Passed Google” Is Not a Pre-flight Check

Google Ads and Microsoft Advertising share a surface-level similarity — both review ads before serving them — but run with different editorial standards. An ad that has run cleanly on Google for months can fail Microsoft on copy style or landing-page hygiene alone. Treating a Google approval as a Microsoft pre-flight is the most common source of disapprovals on cross-platform launches.

The full reference is Microsoft Advertising's Editorial Reason Codes, but the practically important distinctions cluster in four areas:

• Capitalization and punctuation. Microsoft disallows excessive or random capitalization (reason codes 16, 45) and repeated punctuation or symbols such as "!!!" or "★" (code 19). Google rarely disapproves on these grounds.
• Superlatives and vague calls-to-action. "Best," "#1," and "guaranteed" trigger codes 92, 93, 362, and 363 unless the claim is substantiated on the landing page. "Click here" is a documented disapproval under code 53; Google treats it as a style preference, not a rejection trigger.
• Grammar, word count, and phone numbers. Spelling errors (codes 46, 54), fewer than three words (codes 31, 63), and phone numbers embedded in ad text (codes 7, 35, 52, 8155) each trigger a discrete disapproval. Phone numbers belong in call extensions, not ad copy.
• Landing-page quality. Microsoft requires the landing page to be reachable around the clock, relevant to the ad offer, carry a privacy policy if collecting personal data (codes 67, 119, 152–154), and serve without pop-ups on entry or exit (codes 56, 89, 117). A page Google accepted without issue fails Microsoft's landing-page review on any of these points.

MB Adv Agency treats a Google-to-Microsoft migration as requiring a genuine editorial pre-flight, not a copy-paste of approved Google creative. The pre-flight covers ad copy style, landing-page hygiene, and a review of the reason-code reference for any restricted categories in the account's verticals. Catching these differences before submission eliminates the review cycle for advertisers running Microsoft Ads keywords and ad copy.

Restricted and Prohibited Content Under Bing Ads / Microsoft Advertising Policies

Microsoft Advertising's content policies — the same framework known as Bing Ads policies before the April 2019 rebrand — divide into two distinct tiers that require different responses. Prohibited content is off-limits with no exception path. Restricted content is allowed with conditions: a market-specific certification, a formal exception request, or licensing compliance. Conflating the two is the most expensive misread a policy-sensitive advertiser can make.

The restricted tier has lead time built into it. For pharmacy advertising in the US, NABP/VIPPS accreditation is the gate. For financial products and services, local-law compliance is required and a formal exception request is often necessary before any ad serves. For drug and alcohol addiction recovery, certification is required under reason code 8436. These are not creative problems — they are credential and process problems. MB Adv Agency builds the certification and exception-request lead time into the campaign timeline so launch day is not the day the review process starts. For personal injury law PPC and dental PPC, the editorial tier is the primary gate — scrutiny on claims and disclaimers, not restricted-content certification. And for advertisers running regulated-vertical campaigns in markets like Missoula legal PPC, the state-level regulatory requirements stack on top of the federal restricted-category rules.

Sources: Microsoft Advertising — Disallowed content policies; Microsoft Advertising — Impact to your account (account-level enforcement and egregious policy risk). Re-confirm all borderline category assignments against the live Microsoft policy pages before launching any restricted-vertical campaign.

Common Disapprovals on Microsoft Advertising — Cause and Fix

Most Microsoft Advertising disapprovals fall into two buckets: editorial style (ad copy formatting, grammar, word count, prohibited phrasing) and landing-page quality (site reachability, ad-to-page relevance, privacy policy, pop-ups). Neither bucket requires interacting with Microsoft's compliance team — the fix is in the reason code attached to the disapproved asset.

The reframe that matters: a disapproval is far more often a fixable quality signal than an accusation that the business is in a banned category. Read the reason code, apply the documented fix, resubmit the asset or appeal via the editorial review and appeals process. For Microsoft Advertising campaign types with multi-asset creative — Responsive Search Ads, Performance Max — the fix targets the specific flagged asset, not the whole ad. That is the practical benefit of the November 2025 asset-level review.

The trademark row is especially relevant for legal advertisers and insurance advertisers who reference competitor names in comparative ads. Microsoft distinguishes three legitimate use categories — authorized reseller/service provider, compatible use, and informational/editorial use — and the appeal requires documentation of the relationship. The restricted-vertical row is relevant for CBD & hemp advertisers: the fix is not a copy edit, it is completing the exception or certification path before expecting the ad to pass. For advertisers running accounts in specific markets — including campaigns managed through PPC management in Austin and PPC management in Chicago — state-level requirements layer on top of the federal policy framework.

Frequently Asked Questions